Friday 21 October 2016

The Oromo Nation – A Fait Accompli?

2009/2/20 (Ethiopian calendar)
2016/10/20 (European calendar)

[Note: An Amharic version of this post will appear sometime!]

(pdf)

I've just read Dr Ezekiel Gebissa's reply to Dr Tedla Woldeyohannes' questions about the upcoming Oromo Leadership Convention in Atlanta. While answering the questions, Dr Ezekiel gives us some idea of his vision of the relationship between the Oromo nation and Ethiopia. In this article I'll take what I consider to be the best parts of his article – two major points – and expand on them.

The first is that Ethiopian history, in other words the story of Ethiopia, can be interpreted in various ways. It can be made to fit a story of a single nation albeit with different ethnic groups, or a nation of nations, or even prison of nations.

For what it's worth, I too agree that history and ethnic and national identity are to a large extent matters of interpretation. No one interpretation is the Gospel Truth. We can argue all we want about these, as we have done for decades, as laymen, as academicians, as politicians, in various contexts and within different paradigms; some of us might even change our minds; but at the end of the day, if we want live together in peace, we have to be able to agree to disagree.

Note that I say this as an ardent Ethiopian nationalist who considers the synthesis story of one multiethnic nation as the true story. Further, I consider the ethnic nationalist story not only untrue but that if it goes too far, it does not bode well for the nation as a whole. The mere fact that arguments for this story are often buttressed by claims of victimhood obviously makes for tensions, acrimony, and negative competition between ethnic groups. I would like to note that such claims are not at all necessary to build the ethnic nationalist story – it can be constructed quite well without them – but the fact that they are often used illustrates the risks that come with ethnic nationalism.

But I digress... There are valid differing opinions and they have to co-exist. In order to co-exist, I believe that we Ethiopian nationalists have not only to strive to understand these opinions, but beyond understanding we must try to empathize. Look, Oromo ethnic nationalism is not the first ethnic nationalism in the world! Plenty of other multiethnic nations are having to deal with ethnic nationalisms of different types. This alone should give one pause. We are not alone. As such I believe that humility requires that we Ethiopian nationalists step back re-assess our understanding and response to ethnic nationalism. Yes, we are right to stand and argue against it, but our position should not be as in the past, where we fought against the very right of ethnic nationalism to be politically expressed and advocated repressing it by force. That was then and is now not only an unwise but also, dare I say, an immoral course.

The second point of Dr Ezekiel's that I wish to discuss is the following: that all the arguments have been made and done, and today the Oromo nation, as part of an Ethiopian nation of nations, is a fait accompli. Ethnicity is enshrined in the Ethiopian constitution and a generation of Oromos have been taught, exclusively, ethnic nationalism. Again, this is true. Sad, for us Ethiopian nationalists, but true! We have to not only accept this new political reality, but we have to learn from how it came about so that we can avoid making the same mistakes as the past.

So, how did it come about? We Ethiopian nationalists played a huge role by mismanaging the country, by neglecting to make necessary accommodations, and perhaps worst of all, by committing political fratricide over the past half century. We managed to convert Eritrea from a region eager to join Ethiopia to a nation willing to sacrifice thousands to leave it. We made Ethiopia such an inhospitable and repressive country that some relatively few ethnic nationalist elites were able to leverage this into a vast expansion of ethnic nationalism. After the EPRDF gained power, rather than doing the obvious – conducting a self-examination to see how we could go so wrong as to leave the hands of the country in the hands of self-proclaimed ethnic nationalists – we concentrated on blaming the EPRDF for happening to fill a vacuum we created! And we bickered... Even after the EPRDF instituted today's radical ethnic nationalist constitution, we continued, in absentia, to argue amongst ourselves while the roots of ethnic nationalism spread!

Yet, despite the failures of the elite, Ethiopian nationalism still remained strong among the masses. You will recall that even just eleven years ago Kinijit demonstrated an unexpected amount of nation-wide support for at least some degree of de-ethnicization. However, our Ethiopian nationalist elites managed to make a right mess of that as well. Even today, there is no significant Ethiopian nationalist political movement – Ethiopian nationalism, as a story remains only in the hearts of the masses.

Now, we have to face Dr Ezekiel's fait accompli, not with denial, not by blaming others, and not with nostalgia, but by accepting reality and responding with a constructive agenda. Given the huge rise in Oromo ethnic nationalism and the confused state of the EPRDF, the nation of Ethiopia needs a strong Ethiopian nationalist movement to act as a counter-balance – to bring about a less risky equilibrium to the country's politics. The impediment to this is not the EPRDF nor Oromo ethnic nationalism, but the Ethiopian nationalist elite. It is time we pull ourselves up with our bootstraps before it is too late.

5 comments :

  1. Selam Ato Dargue,
    I had an opportunity to read your article analyzing Dr. Ezekiel's views. I have heard Dr. Ezekiel speaking on his expertise, that I believe is the social history of the Oromo. I concluded that his overarching historic perspectives on Ethiopia have not developed enough. Asking or expecting from Dr. Ezekiel a broader scope of social and political perspectives would be disarming him and pulling him into a different domain he can articulate little perhaps no even as much as you have done. However, the argument against his proposition is not nationalism for that is only a weapon against external forces. The most effective weapon, as far as I am concerned is Individualism as opposed to regionalism or gossa ideology. Let us advocate for a nation of individuals or individualism. This concept will bring all Ethiopians together. It is powerful than religion and will be for Ethiopians. Dr. Ezekiel and the rest will begin to think like high school kids when ordinary Ethiopians in Asmara, Gondar, Nekemt, and all place rise and spread the concept and create Ethiopia as a nation of individualism!
    Thank you. Keep up the wonderful work
    Zeg Fanta

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comments, Ato Zeg.

    By individualism, I assume giving primacy to individual rights over group rights, and perhaps you mean going to the extent of some type of libertarianism. It's something to discuss, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. As correctly articulated by Ato Zeg Fanta, the right of the individual outweigh the right of the group. It is amazing to me that we are everyday regressing in terms of social development. The Ethiopian people is now identified as 'peoples'. A nation that help build the spirit of pan-Africanism is now melting down and made to think in terms of tribal (language) group. When do we grow up?

    Yesteryear's United States is now "One Nation, Under God, Indivisible .....". Individual right is preeminent to all other forms of right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for your comment, Ato Tsehay.

    As I mentioned in the post, there are plenty of examples of ethnic nationalism around the world, and many cases of separation. We all know about Scotland, Catalonia, Quebec, etc. Even in the US, there are many who advocate for some sort of multiculturalism, and we don't know what the impact of the increasing Hispanic population will be in this regard. Are these all examples of regressive social development, or is there more to it? I tend to think that there is more to it - it's a natural part of the human condition.

    If I may, this is my understanding, in brief. As we all know, all nations in their history have gone through wars of various kinds between various groups, sometimes speaking the same language, sometimes not. After some time and plenty of integration or assimilation, these groups would coalesce into a single nation. However, during this process of integration or assimilation, while the wounds were fresh, so to speak, the conquered or losing groups would consider themselves distinct and would pine for independence or freedom. Even after 400 years the Indian subcontinent would not consider itself an integrated or assimilated part of the British Empire. All this to say that ethnic nationalism is not a simple but nuanced phenomenon. I think.

    And furthermore, a nuanced understanding is absolutely necessary in order to have any sort of dialogue, let alone understanding, with ethnic nationalists.

    Thanks, again, Ato Tsehay.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Professor Ezekiel Gebissa and Ato Asfaw Dargue Meshal are suggesting on ethiomedia that the Woyane/OLF Kilil is the way to go forward. For that we "Ethiopian nationalists" as suggested by Ato Asfaw the "weakest" compared to the ethnic nationalists , I do not know what test he used to measure it, have to work very hard otherwise it will be too little to late.

    Are there Oromo Nation armies who controlled the current Oromia marching to take Addis Ababa/Finfine as its historical capital claimed by the Oromo nationalists ?? Can Addis Ababa residents of multi ethnic groups claim it as "Addis Nation" Why not ?? There are five or more million people.

    Why should we accept the Woyane/OLF made kilil as if it was done with the participation of the people ? Dividing Ethiopia into nine kilils brought conflicts on land/water and it also brought ethnic cleansing that resulted to large numbers of population displacement and death. Amharas were targeted in most kilils with vengeance and hate.

    It is true that Ethiopia is a home for more than 80 ethnic groups of people like Oromos who have their language and culture. Why should we deny the Welayta, Kembata, Sidama among others etc their own nation like Oromo and call them "Southern People" ?

    Did we not have historically a Welayta "king" an Adal Sultan similar to the claims Professor Ezekiel put forward for Oromo Nation ? Or is this the game number ? Oromos are tens of millions while others have less numbers ? Are we going back in time and make territorial adjustment or recognition for what happened few hundreds years ago by declaring Welayta, Sidama, Kembata etc and expand the nine nations to few tens if not 80 nations ??

    Nations are mainly built by the barrel of Gun in war time and economic survival in peaceful time, Ethiopia is no exception. Who ever has Gun will establish and declare a state. As we speak, the Kurds who have their own unrecognized enclave in Northern Iraq after 1990s are expanding using the ongoing war against ISIS in Mosul as a cover. We heard them boasting that they will not leave. They are right !! The Sunnis know haw to fight and Gun is not a problem. The Syria we see now is totally different from Syria of 2011. When the war will be over Syria will not be the same. We will have a Syrian Nation in Europe too ??

    Similarly the current 9 kilils geography will expand or decrease by whoever got the upper hand in the battle front. That is the truth Ezkel and Ato Asfaw afraid to tell us. Ethiopian nationalists know how to fight for Ethiopia like their ancestors did in the past and the Talk will come later if it is now seen as weakness.

    ReplyDelete

ለሀሳብዎ አመሰግናለሁ!